微信直播

AME循证杂谈015|如何提高高分杂志投稿命中率?

Published at: 2015年第1卷第S1期

谷万杰
关键词:

自2014年12月AME科研时间循证杂谈专栏“开业”以来,一直深受大伙儿的喜爱,在感谢粉丝们的支持同时,小科今天还要和大家分享个好消息——循证杂谈专栏作者又添一名猛将啦!AME携手丁香园循证医学版07版主谷万杰,定期给大家推荐其“07循证趣谈专栏”的精彩文章,敬请期待!

 

下面有请07老湿给大家打个招呼:

各位小伙伴们,大家好!我是丁香园循证医学版07版主谷万杰,07循证趣谈公众号于已经正式开通啦!不管你是大牛还是草根,不管你是高富帅还是矮穷挫,不管你是白富美还是黑穷丑,不管你是……07循证趣谈愿意和你一起,畅谈循证故事,分享循证快乐。欢迎您的关注和支持!公众号:happyEBM_007,公众号的原则是“分享快乐循证”,将定期向大家推送循证趣谈,比如循证杂谈,循证故事,循证找茬,循证方法等方面的内容,更期待您的加入!有兴趣的童鞋,可以发邮件至wanjiegu@hotmail.com,和我分享自己的循证故事,我们将分享给更多的人!再次感谢您的关注和支持!希望07循证趣谈在带给你快乐的同时也能让你有所收获,因为我们旨在分享快乐循证!

 

如何提高投稿命中率?(尤其适用于想发高分文章的童鞋)

帅哥美女们,周末过得还愉快吗?考虑到很多小伙伴难道有一个周末可以休息,逛街,打游戏,还有其他,比如,你懂得。。。周一疲劳综合征袭来,估计很多小伙伴们还没恢复元气,07老湿今天就分享一个比较简单实用的技能,像游戏里面的大招一样威力无穷,神马意思呢?这个大招技能不经常使用,但是一旦出招,非死即伤,当然,用的好就超神咯。

扯淡正式开始咯,相信很多伙伴们精心准备的文章,都想发个高分杂志,有些不问青红皂白就直接投稿过去,很快悲剧了,有时候即使外审了,回来被批的遍体鳞伤,一无是处,最后还是给无情的拒绝了,有些童鞋觉得自己的文章是一个香饽饽,自信地以为一定可以发个高分,结果到最后,屎都没挤出来,甚至连个屁都没有,经过几次痛苦的折磨,这时候可能被别人抢先发表,雪上加霜啊,甚至最后文章被雪藏起来了,成了抽屉文献,说到底,都是为了苦逼的SCI,梦寐以求的高分文章啊,但是伙伴们有没有想过什么原因?或者我们是否有更好的办法能够预防这些悲剧在我们身上发生甚至一次次重演?子曰,世上无难事,只怕有心人。07老湿经过自己在循证道路上的摸索,找到了一些窍门,今天传授给各位一个大招。

很多杂志,尤其是高分杂志和专业顶尖期刊发的文章很少,对文章要求很高,甚至会在投稿须知里面明确告诉我们部分类型的文章不接受作者主动投稿,需要和编辑进行提前沟通。关键点来了,投稿之前主动和目标期刊编辑进行良好的沟通会让我们事半功倍,缩短发表周期,提高命中率。

前段时间07老湿发了一篇meta分析在CMAJ杂志上,目前来看,是国人在上面发表的第一篇meta分析,这个杂志分数不是很高,6分左右,以前10分,最近几年降下来了,大家要知道加拿大麦克马斯特大学是循证医学的发源地,这是加拿大的顶尖大学,自然这个杂志也不是那么容易发表,对文章要求很是严格,一年才发50篇左右文章,一年18期,每期2-3篇。但是经过悉心准备,07老湿最后还是如愿以偿地在这个杂志上灌了一篇meta。其中一个比较重要的原因就是在投稿之前,我和主编写信进行提前沟通了,07老湿不卖关子了,直接给大家分享一下自己是如何和主编沟通的?伙伴们最想知道有模板吗?有,07老湿自己做的,贴出来仅供大家参考。

首先,你要去杂志主页找到如何联系杂志编辑部,找到邮箱,这是最重要的第一步,当然你也可以去pubmed或者google搜索主编名字,然后找到他最新的邮箱,同时一起发邮件给杂志编辑部和主编。

然后呢,就是你要写邮件的主题,一般可以这样写:

Presubmission inquiry to CMAJ(伙伴们将CMAJ换成自己准备咨询的杂志名字)

收件人就是要咨询的杂志编辑部联系邮箱和主编的联系邮箱。

正文部分:

Proposal

 

Lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes for surgical patients

 

Dear John Fletcher and CMAJ Editorial Board:

 

Hope this e-mail findsyou well.Sorry to disturb you,thank you for taking the time to read my letter.

 

背景部分: Estimates suggest thatmore than 230 million patients undergo surgery worldwide each year, withreported mortality rates between 1% and 4%. Postoperative pulmonarycomplications are associated with perioperative mortality and morbidity. Themodality of mechanical ventilationmight affect the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.Lung-protective mechanical ventilation with the use of lower tidal volumes hasbeen found to improve outcomes of patients with acute respiratory distresssyndrome (ARDS). However, its role in adult patients undergoing surgery withgeneral anesthesia remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluatethe effect of ventilation with lower tidal volumes on clinical outcomes inthese patients.结果部分:We included 14randomized controlled trials involving 1,222 patients. Meta-analysis showed adecrease in development of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome(relative risk [RR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17–0.73; P =0.005),pulmonary infection (RR, 0.40; 95% CI,0.24–0.69; P = 0.0008), atelectasis (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.31–0.78; P= 0.003), and length of hospital stay (meandifference [MD], -0.66 days; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.05 days; P = 0.03)in patients receiving lung-protective ventilationwith lower tidal volumes. There was no significant difference in mortality (RR,0.74; 95% CI, 0.38–1.46; P = 0.39), new onset arrhythmia (RR, 0.80; 95%CI, 0.39–1.62; P = 0.54), and length of ICU stay (MD, -0.07 days; 95%CI, -0.86 to 0.71 days; P = 0.85) between the lower and higher tidalvolumes groups. 结论部分:The results suggestthat in adult patients undergoing surgery with general anesthesia,lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes decreases postoperativepulmonary complications and length of hospital stay, but do not confermortality benefit.

PS:以上部分是你对自己的选题的背景、初步结果和结论进行一个简单的介绍。

We believe that our findings could be ofinterest to the readers of CMAJ, and particularly toresearchers working on 换成你文章的主题. As an international leadingjournal devoted to human health worldwide换成你的专业的,比如重症就是criticalcare medicine,一般每个杂志都有自己的scope介绍, CMAJrepresents the perfect platform for us toshare these findings with the international research community.

We disclosethat we have written the entire articleourselves. Besides, we did not receiveany form of sponsorship or honorarium for the material manuscript.Furthermore, no pharmaceutical company, or its representative, was involved in the funding or authorship. Finally, we declare no any potential conflict of interest with a company whose products will be discussed in the review.

Please address all correspondence to: XXX, 详细的通讯地址,包括单位,可是,城市,省份,国家,邮编,街道地址,传真和电话,还有邮箱。

Authordetail (对自己团队的自我介绍,让他们对你的团队成员有个简单的了解)

Wan-Jie Gu is nowstudying as a master course student and majors in Anesthesiology. His majorresearch interests include systematic reviews and meta-analysis, evidence-basedmedicine, critical care medicine, and clinical anesthesiology. As the firstauthor, he has published more than 30 papers in peerreview journals such as CHEST,European Respiratory Journal, Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Medicine,Critical Care and etc. He authored chapters of a book on hisresearch interests. He is one of Section Editors (Systematic Review andMeta-analysis) in Journal of Thoracic Disease. He also acts as a forummoderator in http://i.dxy.cn/profile/200750383.

XXXX 团队其他成员的介绍

 

We shall look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience.

 

Best regards,

XXX and co-authors

 

最后呢,你要耐心等待编辑部的消息,一般都会给你回复的,快的话两三天内,慢的话基本上也在一周之内。

 

一起看看CMAJ在收到07老湿的Presubmission inquiry之后是如何回复我的,我是一周之内才收到主编的回复,本来以为石沉大海了,后来看了邮件才知道,编辑部还开了个会专门讨论了我的选题之后才回复我邮件的。

Dear Dr Gu,

Thank you for writing to me. As you know we do like to publish systematic reviews, the topic you have chosen isrelevant to a wide readership, and it may well be that your article is suitablefor CMAJ. Selection would be subject to peer review so I cannot give youany firm promises at this point but do please submit your manuscript via ourmanuscript website http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmaj.

 

Best wishes,

Dr. John Fletcher

Editor-in-Chief

 

CMAJ – medical knowledge that matters

CMAJ show cases innovative research and ideas aimed at improving health for people in Canada and globally. It publishes original clinical research, analyses and reviews, news, practice updates and thought-provoking editorials. CMAJ has an impact factor of 6.5 and itswebsite receives over 2.2 million unique visitors a year.

 

大家要知道,这个回复已经非常nice,明显就是说我们感兴趣,欢迎你投稿,但是还没看到全文,也不能保证什么,但是尽管投搞过来吧。

07老湿也礼貌性的回复了,告诉他们我将需要花费多长时间能够完成稿件,投稿到他们这个杂志。

Dear Dr. John Fletcher,

 

Many thanks for your letter andpermission. After finishing the SR, we will submit our paper to CMAJ. And we may spend about 6-8 weeks to complete the remaining work.

 

Best Regards,

Wan-Jie Gu and co-authors

 

我准备好文章之后呢,就投搞过去了,顺便发了邮件告诉他们稿件的稿号,很快编辑就处理文章了,一审28天之后给个Revision,修回去之后直接接受了。是不是节省了很多时间,磨刀不误砍柴工,提前和目标期刊编辑进行良好的沟通也是一个很实用的技巧哦。

 

有的伙伴就问了,万一不回邮件或者说不合适呢,没关系,咱可以同时多发几个自己想投稿的目标期刊,总有一个给机会吧,哈哈~

 

当然,文章本身的质量,比如临床价值大的选题,可靠真实的方法,简洁清晰的结果,具有深度的讨论,文章具有良好的设计和展示给读者和编辑等等。

 

最后,希望这个大招技能能够对各位小伙伴有所帮助,助你发表梦寐以求的高分文章。

 

温馨提醒:不要一字不差的抄袭07老湿的内容,红色下划线部分是需要大家值得注意和替换的内容,如果你把这些搞错了,估计也就完蛋啦!

 

作者|谷万杰,欢迎识别下图二维码关注其微信公众号。

AME循证杂谈专栏

 

01 走出循证医学的八大误区

02 临床医生该如何高效的检索?

03 系统评价哪家强?

04 正确认识系统评价/meta分析在医学科研和临床实践中的作用

05 何为一篇好文章?

06 随机对照试验中那些真假难辨的亚组分析

07 随机对照试验的批判性阅读

08 系统评价的idea从哪里来?

09 顶级医学杂志发表什么样的meta分析?

10 如何画出人生第一张森林图?

11 亚组分析在meta分析中的应用

12 如何用图形完美展示临床研究中亚组分析的结果

13 随访资料的生存分析-基于Stata软件的统计学实现

14 Meta回归在Stata软件中的实现

15 如何提高高分杂志投稿命中率?

 

点击链接查看上期循证杂谈精彩文章《Meta回归在Stata软件中的实现》。http://kysj.amegroups.com/articles/2549

Doi:10.3978/kysj.2014.1.714

comments powered by Disqus

附件